There are many indicators to help you determine the reputability of an open-access journal. Here are some important criteria, as suggested by librarians at Grand Valley State University.
Positive indicators
- Scope of the journal is well-defined and clearly stated.
- Journal’s primary audience is researchers/practitioners.
- Editor and/or editorial board are recognized experts in the field.
- Journal is affiliated with or sponsored by an established scholarly society or academic institution.
- Articles are within the scope of the journal and meet the standards of the discipline.
- Any fees or charges for publishing in the journal are easily found on the journal web site and clearly explained.
- Articles have DOIs (Digital Object Identifier, e.g., doi:10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00054.x).
- Journal clearly indicates rights for use and reuse of content at article level (e.g., Creative Commons CC BY license).
- Journal has an ISSN (International Standard Serial Number, e.g., 1234-5678).
- Publisher is a member of Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association.
- Journal is listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals.
- Journal is included in subject databases and/or indexes.
Negative indicators
- Journal web site is difficult to locate or identify.
- Publisher “About” information is absent on the journal’s website.
- Publisher direct marketing (i.e., spamming) or other advertising is obtrusive.
- "Instructions to authors" information is not available.
- Information on peer review and copyright is absent or unclear on the journal's website.
- Journal scope statement is absent or extremely vague.
- No information is provided about the publisher, or the information provided does not clearly indicate a relationship to a mission to disseminate research content.
- Repeat lead authors in same issue.
- Publisher has a negative reputation (e.g., documented examples in Chronicle of Higher Education, email distribution lists, etc.).